With the joint cooperation of Payam Noor University and the Scientific Association of Iran Public Library Advancement

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Department of Library and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran. Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Payame Noor University

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the knowledge structure in Entrepreneurship research using co-word analysis, to identify top authors in the field by number of articles, number of citations, and h-index, and to visualize the international collaboration network in it.
Methodology: Social network analysis, citation analysis, and co-occurrence analysis are used in conducting this research. The research population consists of articles published in the field of entrepreneurship that have been indexed in Web of Science in the last 20 years (1997-2016)
Findings: Results indicated that Iran’s international research on entrepreneurship has grown steadily during the last decades. Co-word analysis showed that “Entrepreneurship”, “SMEs”, and “Innovation” are the most frequent keywords in this research area. Moreover, “Entrepreneurship-Innovation”, “Entrepreneurship-self employment”, and “Entrepreneurship-economic development” are top co-words in this field. Results of cluster analysis led to the creation of 7 topical clusters in entrepreneurship research. Furthermore, data analysis uncovered that “Wright M” is the most prolific, “Shane S” is the most cited, and again “Wright M” has the highest h-index among all entrepreneurship researchers. Also, based on co-authorship indicators, “Wright M” owns the best position in the network.
Conclusions: According to the results of this research, it seems that since 1990s, the emergence and development of World Wide Web has had a positive impact of the growth of research in entrepreneurship. On the other hand, thematic clusters can give a macro view of topics in entrepreneurship. Finally, based on integrative indicators, it can be stated that “Wright M” is the most influential researcher in entrepreneurship during past 20 years.

Keywords

حبیبی، روزبه؛ مختارپور، رضا و خاصه، علی‌اکبر (1396). تحلیل سیر تکاملی پژوهش‌های جهانیِ کارآفرینی با فنون علم‌سنجی. نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، 10(4)، 575-594.
دانشفر، کرم‌اله و جلیلی، سودابه (1389). کارآفرینی و خط‌مشی‌های کارآفرینی. فصلنامة خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی در مدیریت، 1(2)، 186-222.
سهیلی، فرامرز؛ شریف‌مقدم، هادی؛ موسوی چلک، افشین و خاصه، علی‌اکبر (1394). تأثیرگذارترین پژوهشگران در حوزۀ آی متریکس: نگاهی ترکیبی به شاخص‌های تأثیرگذاری. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی دانشگاهی، 49 (1)، 23-54.
سهیلی، فرامرز و عصاره، فریده (1391). جستاری بر ساختار شبکه‌های هم‌نویسندگی، کتاب ماه کلیات، 16(3)، 62-73.
عزیزی، محمد و ملایجردی، مریم (1396). روش‌ها تأمین مالی کارآفرینی اجتماعی. تحقیقات مالی، 19(1)، 119-138.
طالبی، کامبیز و یکتا، محمدرضا (1387). آموزش کارآفرینی دانشگاهی و نقش آن در ایجاد و توسعۀ شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط دانش‌بنیان. نشریة توسعة کارآفرینی، 1(1)، 111-131.
فیروزآبادی، سید احمد؛ ایمانی، حسین و دباغی، حمیده (1397). تعاونی‌های زنان روستایی، پتانسیلی برای کارآفرینی اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی: تعاونی زنان روستایی مهر آفرین ارم- شهرستان پاکدشت). زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان)، 16(1)، 149-173.
 
Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R. & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981–1999. Research policy, 34(3), 259-285.
Ahn, S., Yoon, J. & Kim, Y. (2018). The innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises and their growth: quantile regression analysis and structural equation modeling. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 316-342.
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B. & Young, S. L. (2010). Debates in entrepreneurship: Opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 23-45). Springer New York.
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C. & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1507-1513.
Brockhaus, R.H. (1987) Entrepreneurial folklore. Journal of Small Business Management,  6(2), 1-6.
Bryden, J.M. & Keith, H.  (2004). A new approach to rural development in Europe: Germany, Greece, Scotland and Sweden. New York: Mellen Press.
Bull, I., Thomas, H. & Willard, G.  (1995). Entrepreneurship: perspectives on theory building. Pergamon, Oxford.
Cornelius, B., Landström, H. & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398.
Devece, C. A., Palacios-Marques, D. & Fernandez, R. (2011). Entrepreneurship research in service industries: a literature classification and trend analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 479-493.
Dinis, A. (2006) Marketing and innovation: useful tools for competitiveness in rural and peripheral areas. European Planning Studies, 14(1), 9-22
Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., Peris-Ortiz, M. & Ratten, V. (2017). Female entrepreneurship: a co-citation analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(2), 325-340.
Gregoire, D. A., Noel, M. X., Déry, R. & Béchard, J. P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co–citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981–2004. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(3), 333-373.
Hawley, C.B. and E.T. Fujii (1993) An empirical analysis of preferences for financial risk: further evidence on the Friedman–Savage model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16(2), 197–204.
Hyung Kim, A.C. (2012). Knowledge structure in sport management: Bibliometric and social network analyses. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Kraus, S. (2011). State-of-the-art current research in international entrepreneurship: A citation analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 1020-1038.
Kraus, S., Filser, M., O’Dwyer, M. & Shaw, E. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: an exploratory citation analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 8(2), 275-292.
Landström, H. (2004). Pioneers in entrepreneurship research. Crossroads of entrepreneurship, 3(1), 13-31.
Landström, H., Harirchi, G. & Astrom, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Knowledge Base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181.
Latchem, C. (2018). Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprises. In Open and Distance Non-formal Education in Developing Countries (pp. 145-154). Springer, Singapore.
Loi, M., Castriotta, M. & Di Guardo, M. C. (2016). The theoretical foundations of entrepreneurship education: How co-citations are shaping the field. International Small Business Journal, 34(7), 948-971.
López‐Fernández, M. C., Serrano‐Bedia, A. M. & Pérez‐Pérez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and family firm research: A bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 622-639.
Lordkipanidze, M., Brezet, H. & Backman, M. (2005) The entrepreneurship factor in sustainable tourism development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(8), 787-798
Luor, T., Lu, H. P., Yu, H. & Chang, K. (2014). Trends in and contributions to entrepreneurship research: a broad review of literature from 1996 to June 2012. Scientometrics, 99(2), 353-369.
Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B., Grant, K., Glänzel, W. & Debackere, K. (2014). Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics, 98(1), 473-485.
Pato, M. L. & Teixeira, A. A. (2016). Twenty years of rural entrepreneurship: a bibliometric survey. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(1), 3-28.
Polo-Peña, A.I., Frías-Jamilena, D.M. & Rodríguez-Molina, M. Á.  (2013. Market orientation as a strategy for the rural tourism sector its effect on tourist behavior and the performance of enterprises. Journal of Travel Research, 52(2), 225–239.
Reader, D. & Watkins, D. (2006). The Social and Collaborative Nature of Entrepreneurship Scholarship: A Co–Citation and Perceptual Analysis. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(3), 417-441.
Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651-1655.
Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A. & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co–citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, New Brunswick, NJ.: Transaction Publishers.
Teixeira, A. A. (2011). Mapping the (in) visible college (s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89(1), 1.
Truex, D. P., Cuellar, M. J., Takeda, H. & Vidgen, R. (2011). The Scholarly influence of Heinz Klein: Ideational and social measures of his impact on IS research and IS scholars. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 422-439.
Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
Volery, T. & Mazzarol, T. (2015). The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: A bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal. International Small Business Journal, 33(4), 374-396.
Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W. & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131816.
Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A. & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1633-1652.