مدل علی فرسودگی دیجیتال بر اساس شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال با نقش واسطه‌ای تنظیم هیجانات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام‌ نور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام ‌نور، تهران، ایران،

3 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه پیام‌ نور، تهران، ایران.

10.30473/mrs.2025.75050.1642

چکیده

هدف: هدف از این پژوهش تعیین میزان برازش مدل علی فرسودگی دیجیتال بر اساس شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال با نقش واسطه‌ای تنظیم هیجانات بود.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ شیوه اجرا توصیفی- همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه معلمان دوره‌ی ابتدایی شهر کرمانشاه بود. حجم نمونه بر اساس نرم‌افزار جی پاور تعیین و 124 نفر برآورد گردید. ابزارهای گردآوری داده‌های پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه‌های شایستگی معلمان در آموزش آنلاین پالیوان (2021)، خودکارآمدی دیجیتال هولکام، کینگ و براون (2004)، تنظیم هیجانات گراس و جان (2003) و فرسودگی دیجیتال ارتن و اوزدمیر (2020) بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار SmatrPLS به روش معادلات ساختاری و تحلیل مسیر، استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال بر فرسودگی دیجیتال اثر منفی و معناداری دارند. شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال بر تنظیم هیجانات اثر مثبت و معناداری دارند. همچنین تنظیم هیجانات بر فرسودگی دیجیتال اثر منفی و معناداری دارد. علاوه بر این، شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال با نقش میانجی تنظیم هیجانات بر فرسودگی دیجیتال اثر منفی و معناداری دارند. بنابراین، مدل مدل علی فرسودگی دیجیتال بر اساس شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال با نقش واسطه‌ای تنظیم هیجانات با مدل تجربی برازش دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: معلمان برخوردار از شایستگی تدریس آنلاین و خودکارآمدی دیجیتال و با راهبردهای تنظیم هیجانات مثبت فرسودگی دیجیتالی کمتری را در محیط کار احساس می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Causal Model of Digital Burnout Based on Online Teaching Competence and Digital Self-Efficacy with the Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Faramarz Soheili 1
  • Ali Abdi 2
  • Maryam Moradi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 M. A., Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
the aim of this study was to determine the fit of the causal model of digital burnout based on online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy with the mediating role of emotion regulation.
Methodology
The research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of implementation method. The statistical population included all primary school teachers in Kermanshah in the academic year 2024-2025, numbering 10723 people. The sample size was determined based on the Krejci and Morgan (1997) table and was estimated at 375 people, who were selected using the convenience sampling method. Finally, 124 questionnaires were collected. The research tools included the Palivan Teacher Competency in Online Education Questionnaire (2021), Holcomb, King, and Brown's Digital Self-Efficacy (2004), Gross and John's Emotion Regulation (2003), and Orton and Ozdemir's Digital Burnout (2020). Descriptive statistics indicators including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage were used to analyze the data. Also, to answer the research hypotheses, the results were analyzed using the SmatrPLS software using the structural equation and path analysis method.
 
Findings
Online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy have a negative and significant effect on digital burnout. Online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy have a positive and significant effect on emotion regulation. Also, emotion regulation has a negative and significant effect on digital burnout. In addition, online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy have a negative and significant effect on digital burnout with the mediating role of emotion regulation. Therefore, the causal model of digital burnout based on online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy with the mediating role of emotion regulation fits the empirical model.
Conclusion
Teachers with online teaching competence and digital self-efficacy and with positive emotion regulation strategies have knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes, and confidence in how to use digital technology in education. They also control their emotions and feelings when using digital technology.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital Burnout
  • Online Teaching Competence
  • Digital Self-efficacy
  • Emotion Regulation

مراجع

Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p187
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
Bećirović, S. (2023). Digital Pedagogy. Sprin­ger Nature Singapore.
Bing, H., Sadjadi, B., Afzali, M and Fathi, J. (2022). Self-Efficacy and Emotion Regulation as Predictors of Teacher Burnout Among English as a Foreign Language Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Front. Psychol. 13, 900417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900417
Blömeke, S. (2017). Modelling Teachers’ Professional Competence as a Multi-dimensional Construct. In Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, edited by S. Guerriero, 119–135.
Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., & Tramontano, C. (2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227
Caprara, G., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C., Alessandri, G. (2013). Emotional stability and affective self‐regulatory efficacy beliefs: Proofs of integration between trait theory and social cognitive theory. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1847
Çetin, G., Frank, J. L., & Jennings, P. A. (2025). Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Burnout: The Mediating Roles of Interpersonal Mindfulness in Teaching and Emotion Regulation. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 33(2), 81-98., https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266241272049
Chang, D. (2016). Digital burnout: The new, invisible threat to businesses. FluxTrends.
Chang, M. L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational psychology review, 21(3), 193-218.
Colombo, D., Serino, S., Suso-Ribera, C., Fernández-Álvarez, J., Cipresso, P., García-Palacios, A., ... & Botella, C. (2021). The moderating role of emotion regulation in the recall of negative autobiographical memories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7122.  DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137122
Da Silva, F. P., Jerónimo, H. M., Henriques, P. L., & Ribeiro, J. (2024). Impact of digital burnout on the use of digital consumer platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123172
Daniilidou, A., Platsidou, M., & Gonida, E. (2020). Primary school teachers resilience: association with teacher self-efficacy, burnout and stress. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 18(52), 549-582. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v18i52.3487.
Erten P, Özdemir O. The Digital Burnout Scale Development Study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2020;21(2), 668–83. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.597890.
Fathi, J., Samadi, M., Nourzadeh, S. and Saharkhiz Arabani, A. (2021). The relationship among self-efficacy, self-concept, and burnout among Iranian EFL teachers: A structural equation modelling analysis. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 13(39), 33-55. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.31200.1872. (In Persian)
Friedman, L. (2016). Exhausted? After-hours emails may be to blame. Lehigh Business, 2, 18-19.
Greenier, V., Derakhshan, A., and Fathi, J. (2021). Emotion regulation and psychological well-being in teacher work engagement: a case of British and Iranian English language teachers. System, 97, 102446. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2020.102446
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Guerriero, S., & Révai, N. (2017). Knowledge-based teaching and the evolution of a profession. DOI:10.1787/9789264270695-13-en
Guerriero, S., ed. (2017). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD.
Kaiser, G., and J. König. )2019(.Competence Measurement in (Mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy. Higher Education Policy 32, 597–615. doi:10.1057/s41307-019-00139-z.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622.
Li, C, Zhang, LJ & Jiang, G. (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of foreign language learning burnout among Chinese EFL students. J Multiling Multicult Dev.1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1931246
Li, S. (2023). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: a mediation model. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1185079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185079
Li, X., Zhang, J., & Yang, J. (2024). The effect of computer self-efficacy on the behavioral intention to use translation technologies among college students: Mediating role of learning motivation and cognitive engagement. Acta Psychologica, 246, 104259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104259
Maran, T. K., Liegl, S., Davila, A., Moder, S., Kraus, S., & Mahto, R. V. (2022). Who fits into the digital workplace? Mapping digital self-efficacy and agility onto psychological traits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121352.
Mousavi, S. M. , Amirghassemi, A. and Saeidi, M. (2022). Fluid Intelligence and Self-Efficacy in Iranian Female and Male EFL Teachers’ Burnout: Possible Relationships and Differences. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 10(2), 71-93. doi: 10.22049/jalda.2022.27841.1428. (In Persian])
Oanh, D. T. K., Hien, D. T. D., Thao, H. T. P., Tho, M. A., Trang, D. T. M., & Anh, H. (2023). Development of an online teaching competence framework for University lecturers in Vietnam. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2264034.
Paredes-Aguirre, M., Campoverde Aguirre, R., Hernandez-Pozas, O., Ayala, Y., & Barriga Medina, H. (2024). The Digital Self‐Efficacy Scale: Adaptation and Validation of Its Spanish Version. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 3952946. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3952946
Qiao, X. (2021). Integration model for multimedia education resource based on Internet of things. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life Long Learn. 31, 17–35. doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2021.111849
Rashidov, A. (2020). Use of differentiation technology in teaching mathematics. Eur. J. Res. Reflect. Educ. Sci, 8, 124–136. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2022.107027
Roddy, C., Amiet, D. L., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L., McKenzie, S., Garivaldis, F., Lodge, J. M., & Mundy, M. E. (2017, November). Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
Rozegar M A, Salehi M N, Salehi P, Abdal K. (2021). Investigating the relationship between emotional cognitive regulation strategies and job burnout in dentists in Ilam in 2019. J Dent Med-tums, 34)4), 1-12 URL: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6016-fa.html) In Persian(
Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 611. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611.
Skaalvik, E. M., and Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teach. Teacher Educ, 67, 152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Wang, F., & Ye, Z. (2021). On the role of EFL/ESL teachers' emotion regulation in students' academic engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 758860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758860
Wijaya, KF. (2021). Investigating EFL teachers’ emotional regulation strategies in second language learning contexts. ELT Worldwide, 8, 97. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v8i1.18032.
Xiyun, S., Fathi, J., Shirbagi, N., & Mohammaddokht, F. (2022). A structural model of teacher self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and psychological wellbeing among English teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 904151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904151
Yang, X., & Du, J. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, online pedagogical and content knowledge, and emotion regulation on teacher digital burnout: a mediation model. BMC psychology, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01540-z
Yavari, M., Alidoosti ,F., & Barati, M. (2024). Structural analysis of cognitive strategies for emotion regulation and burnout mediated by job stress in welfare staff. IOH, 21(1), 20.  (In Persian)
Zhao, H. (2021). Positive emotion regulations among English as a foreign language teachers during COVID-19. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 807541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807541

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 18 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 15 شهریور 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار