نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیئت‌علمی گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی
3 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Kerman university librarians have been carried out by 360 degrees.
Methodology: The present study was conducted using analytical survey method and 360 degree feedback was used to evaluate the performance of the community. Information related to the evaluation of their performance was compiled by questionnaires that considered their assessors' self-assessment views, manager's evaluation and evaluation of colleagues and evaluation of library users. The research community of all librarians of Kerman University libraries. The data gathering tool was Faraj Pahloo et al. (2012), which consists of 4 questionnaires to examine the person from the perspective of the head, colleague, referral and person.
Findings: After evaluating the performance of the subjects and comparing the results from the viewpoint of the four evaluation groups, there was a significant difference between the views of the evaluated person and the head of view in the ethical index. There is no significant difference in the performance index between librarians' assessment from the viewpoint of different groups. In the process index, there is only a significant difference between the evaluated point and the point of view.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that in order to obtain more accurate results, one could establish a common language among their assessors and evaluators in terms of their indices and their terms, so that prior to any assessment, On how to evaluate others and rating evaluators so that people are more careful in evaluating their colleagues or other groups and ultimately improving the credibility of the evaluations.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)