پژوهش های کتابخانه های دیجیتالی و هوشمند

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن علمی ارتقاء کتابخانه‌های عمومی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

بررسی مقایسه‌ای عملکرد و همپوشانی کنونی (سال 1400) موتورهای کاوش گوگل، یاهو و بینگ نسبت به سال 1398

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: امروزه با گسترش وب، استفاده از ابزارهای بازیابی موفق از این بستر اطلاعاتی عظیم اهمیت زیادی یافته است. بر این اساس، هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی مقایسه‌ای عملکرد و همپوشانی کنونی موتورهای جستجوی گوگل، یاهو، و بینگ در بازیابی اطلاعات نسبت به سال 1398 است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر یک  پژوهش کاربردی و نیمه تجربی  است. جامعه آماری شامل تمام موتورهای جستجوی فعال در وب است و نمونه‌ها از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند برگزیده شدند.
یافته‌ها: میزان دقت گوگل، یاهو، و بینگ در سه نوع جستجو نسبت به یافته‌‌های پژوهش عباسی دشتکی و قاسمی الوری افزایش یافته است. گوگل همچنان نسبت به موتور جستجوی یاهو و بینگ، دقت بیش‌تری دارد. گوگل در جستجوی سؤالی، یاهو و بینگ در جستجوی عبارتی نسبت به دو نوع دیگر جستجو دقت بیش‌تری داشتند. در سال 1398 گوگل در جستجوی کلیدواژه‌ای، یاهو در جستجوی کلیدواژه‌ای و عبارتی و بینگ در جستجوی کلیدواژه‌ای دقت بالاتری داشتند. همپوشانی بین این موتورهای جستجو نسبت به سال 1398 کم‌تر شده است.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: موتورهای جستجوی نمونه نسبت به سال 1398 عملکرد بهتری از خود نشان داده‌اند و در سه نوع جستجو قدرتمندتر شده‌اند. گوگل با به‌کارگیری نتایج غنی، گراف دانش، رابط کاربری شخصی‌سازی ‌شده، الگوریتم‌هایی از قبیل مرغ مگس‌خوار، پنگوئن، پاندا، و غیره یک ابزار قدرتمند محسوب می‌شود. همپوشانی موتورهای جستجوی مورد بررسی نسبت به سال 1398 کم‌تر شده است. به نظر می‌رسد خزنده های این ابزارها صفحات منحصر برد بیش‌تری را مورد بررسی قرار داده‌اند و این می‌تواند نشان از تمایز و قابلیتهای الگوریتم‌های جدید مورد استفاده در خزنده‌های هر کدام از این ابزارها باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A comparative study of the current performance and overlap of Google, Yahoo and Bing search engines compared to 1398

نویسنده [English]

  • hosein bahari varzaneh

MSc, Department of Knowledge and Information Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Today, with the spread of the web, the use of successful recovery tools from this huge data platform has become very important. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to compare the current performance and overlap of Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines in data retrieval compared to 1398.
Methodology: The present study is an applied and semi-experimental research. The statistical population includes all active search engines on the web and the samples were selected through purposive sampling. The data collection tool is created researcher checklist.
Findings: Findings from the present study showed that the accuracy of search engines Google, Yahoo, and Bank in three types of query, keyword and phrase search compared to the results of the study conducted in the research of Abbasi Dashtaki & Ghasemi Alvari in 1398 increased has found. In addition, Google's search engine is still more accurate than Yahoo and Bing search engines. Google has been more careful in query searching, Yahoo and Bing in phrase search than the other two types of search. Earlier in 1398, Google in keyword search, Yahoo in keyword and phrase search, and Bing in keyword search had higher accuracy. The study of the degree of overlap between them also showed that the overlap between these search engines has decreased compared to 1398 and have shown more unique results in the current study.
Conclusion: The search engines studied have shown better performance compared to 1398 and have become more powerful in three types of search queries, phrases and keywords. Google's search engine uses a structured data generator, algorithms such as Hummingbird, Penguin, Panda, etc., using rich results, knowledge graphs, personalized user interface, and other features that make it a powerful search engine. seems this search engine today the first option of most users in the web world to search and retrieve information. The overlap of the studied search engines has decreased compared to 1398.  It seems that the reptiles of these tools have examined more unique pages, and this could indicate the distinction and capabilities of the new algorithms used in these reptiles of each of these tools.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Search Engine
  • Information Retrieval
  • Precision
  • Overlap
مراجع
Abbasi Dashtaki, N. & Ghasemi Alvari, M. (2019). Retrieval Performance of Fuzzy and Non-Fuzzy Search Engines and Overlap among them. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies. 30(3), 82-93. (In Persian)
Abolghasem Mosalman, T., Momeni, T., & Haji Zeanolabedini, H. (2015). Assess the relevance of the retrieved images by the search engines yahoo, google, pic Search, and flickr for optimization of the proposed model. Journal of knowledge studies, 8(28), 1-12. (In Persian)
Agrawal, R., Golshan, B., & Papalexakis, E. (2016). Overlap in the Web Search Results of Google and Bing. Journal of Web Science, 2(2), 17-30.
Ahmad Khan, J., Sangroha, D., Ahmad, M., & Tanzillur Rahman, M.D. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Semantic Based Search Engines and Keyword based Search Engines, 2014 International Conference on Medical Imaging, m-Health and Emerging Communication Systems (MedCom).
Alibeiq, M R., Jamshidi Orak, R., & Asghari H A, L. (2011). Survey on Traditional Overlap, Relative Overlap and Synthetic Degrees of Freedom between PubMed and Scopus in the Cardiovascular Disease Field. Health Information Management. 8(3), 345- 353. (In Persian)
Alijani, R., Dehghani, L. (2007). Online retrieval, systems and methods. Tehran: Chapar. (In Persian)
Aliyu, F. M., & Yahaya, Y. I. (2021). An Investigation of the Accuracy of Knowledge Graph-base Search Engines: Google knowledge Graph, Bing Satori and Wolfram Alpha. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 12(1), 11-15.
Aslanian, H., Ghazi Mir Saeed, S J. (2015). Comparative Study on Selected Search Engines in Retrieving Information Cleft Lip & Palate 2013-2015. Student Research Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Vice Chancellor for Research. 18(61), 8-15. (In Persian)
Balabantaray, R. C., Swain, M., & Sahoo, B (2013). Evaluation of Web Search Engines Based on Ranking of Results and Features, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction (IJHCI), 3(4), 117-127.
Chahal, P., Singh, M., & Kumar, S. (2013). Ranking of Web Documents using Semantic Similarity. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6524191/?section=abstract
Deka, S. K., & Lahkar, N (2010). Performance evaluation and comparison of the five most used search engines in retrieving web resources, Online Information Review,5(34), 757-771.
Dorri, R. (2015). Comparison and Evaluation of Semantic Search Engines. Information processing & management, 30(2), 467-487. (In Persian)
Egghe L., & Goovaerts, M (2007). A note on measuring overlap. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 189-195.
Fatima, A., Luca, C., & Wilson, G. (2014). New Framework for Semantic Search Engine. International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation. UKSim-AMSS.445-450.
Golzardi, E., Meghdadi, M., & Ghadezadeh, A. (2011). Comparison of the performance of common search engines in searching Persian web pages. National Conference on Computer Engineering and Sustainable Development with a focus on computer networks, modeling and systems security, Proceedings of the 8th  Advances in science and technology. Retrieved from: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-CESD01-CESD01_266.html. (In Persian)
Gul, S., Ali, S., & Hussain, A. (2020). Retrieval performance of Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries in the field of “life science and biomedicine”. Data Technologies and Applications, 54(2), 133-150.
Jamali Mahmoei, H. (2002). Semantic Web: An evolving way to store and retrieve information more efficiently on the Internet. Informology. 1(2), 48-66. (In Persian)
Kousha, K. (2002).  Internet search tools: Principles, skills and facilities for searching on World Wide Web. Tehran: Ketabdar. (In Persian)
Kumar, B. S., & Prakash, J. N. (2009). Precision and relative recall of search engines: a comparative study of Google and Yahoo. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 38, 124-137.
Kumar, K., & Bhadu, V (2013). A comparative study of BYG search engines, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), (2)4, 39-43.
Lewandowski, D. (2015). Evaluating the Retrieval Effectiveness of Web Search Engines Using a Representative Query Sample. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23304/epdf
Mala, V., & Lobiyal, D.K (2016). Semantic and Keyword Based Web Techniques in Information Retrieval, International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA2016). Retrieved October 23, 2017, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7813724/
Nadi R, S. (2014). Information retrieval systems. Tehran: Ketabdar. (In Persian)
Negi, Y. S., & Kumar, S. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Keyword-and Semantic-Based Search Engines. In Intelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics, Springer India, 727-736.
Olajide, A.O., & Matthew, E. D. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Selected Search Engines. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, 5. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271250732_Performance_Evaluation_of_Selected_Searh_Engines
Rahim, I., Mushtaq, H., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Evaluation of search engines using advanced search: comparative analysis of yahoo and bing. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-12.
Rather, R. A., Lone, F. A., & Shah, G. J. (2008). Overlap in web search results: a study of five search engines. Library Philosophy and Practice, 226, 1-6.‏
Sahu, S. K., Mahapatra, D. P., & Balabantaray, R. C. (2016). Comparative study of search engines in context of features and semantics. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 88(2), 210-218.‏
Salman Mohajer, F (2016). Reviewing the Overlap of Results among Google, Yahoo, and Bing Search Engines. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 3(1), 60- 66.
Sheela, A.C.S., & Jayakumar, C. (2019). Comparative Study of Syntactic Search Engine and Semantic Search Engine: A Survey. 5th International Conference on Science Technology Engineering & Management (ICONSTEM), 1-4.
Shiri, A. (1991). Assess the comprehensiveness and barriers of information retrieval systems. Information research and public libraries.  Research on Information Science and Public Libraries. 4 (1, 2), 38-45. (in Persian)
Spink, A., Jansen, B. J., Kathuria, V., & Koshman, S. (2006). Overlap among major web search engines, Internet Research, 16, 419-426.
 Talkhabi, A A. (2012). Survey of knowledge, use and attitude of postgraduate students of Sharif University of Technology towards social-interactive social media Web 2 in conducting research. [MSc Thesis]. Isfahan, Iran: University of Isfahan. (In Persian)
Tumer, D., Shah, M. A., & Bitirim, Y. (2009). An empirical evaluation on semantic search performance of keyword-based and semantic search engines: Google, yahoo, msn and hakia, In Internet Monitoring and Protection 2009, ICIMP'09, 51-55.
Zandian, F., Masoudi N A., Latifi, M., & Kjaje, Z. (2015). Study of Comparative the performance of search engines and Meta engines. Academic Librarianship and Information Research. 49(4), 511-539. (In Persian)
پژوهش های کتابخانه های دیجیتالی و هوشمند
دوره 8، شماره 1 (پیاپی 29) - شماره پیاپی 29
فروردین 1400
صفحه 73-84
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 01 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 01 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 خرداد 1401
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار